@phdthesis{RodriguezOsuna2015, author = {Vanesa Rodriguez Osuna}, title = {Targeting watershed protection in the Guapia{\c{c}}u-Macacu region of the Atlantic Forest, Brazil: An environmental and economic assessment of the potential for a payment for ecosystem services scheme}, url = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:832-cos-882}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Land-use intensification and urbanisation processes are degrading ecosystem services in the Guapia{\c{c}}u-Macacu watershed in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Paying farmers to forgo agricultural production activities in order to restore natural watershed services might be a viable means of securing water resources over the long term for the approximately 2.5 million urban water users in the region. This study quantified the costs of changing current land-use patterns to enhance watershed services. These costs are compared to estimates of the avoided water treatment costs for the public potable water supply as a proxy of willingness-to-pay for watershed services. Farm-household data was used to estimate the opportunity costs of abandoning current land uses in order to allow natural vegetation succession; a process that is very likely to improve water quality in terms of reducing erosion and subsequently water turbidity. Opportunity cost estimates were extrapolated to the watershed scale based on land-use classifications and a vulnerability analysis for identifying priority areas for watershed management interventions. Water quality and treatment cost data from the primary local water treatment plant (principal water user in the study area) were analysed to assess the potential demand for watershed services. The conversion of agricultural land uses for the benefit of watershed service provision was found to entail high opportunity costs in the study area, which is near the city of Rio de Janeiro. Alternative, relatively low-cost practices that support watershed conservation do exist for the livestock production systems. Other options include: implementing soil conservation techniques, permanent protection of areas that are vulnerable to erosion, protecting and restoring riparian and headwater areas, and applying more sustainable agricultural practices. These measures have the potential to directly reduce the amount of sediment and nutrients reaching water bodies and, in turn, decrease the costs of treatment required for providing the potable water supply. Based on treatment costs, the state water utility company’s willingness-to-pay for watershed services alone will not be sufficient to compensate farmers for forgoing agricultural production activities in order to improve the provision of additional watershed services. The results suggest that the opportunity costs of land-cover changes at the scale needed to improve water quality will likely exceed the cost of additional investments in water treatment. Monetary incentives conditioned on specific adjustments to existing production systems could offer a complementary role for improving watershed services. The willingness-to-pay analysis, however, only focused on chemical treatment costs and one of a potentially wide range of ecosystem services provided by the natural vegetation in the Guapia{\c{c}}u-Macacu watershed (water quality maintenance for potable water provision). Other ecosystem services provided by forest cover include carbon sequestration and storage, moderation of extreme weather events, regulation of water flows, landscape aesthetics, and biodiversity protection. Factoring these additional ecosystem services into the willingness-to-pay equation is likely to change the conclusions of the assessment in favour of additional conservation action, either through payments for ecosystem services (PES) or other policy instruments. This effort contributes to the growing body of related scientific literature by offering additional knowledge on how to combine spatially explicit economic and environmental information to provide valuable insights into the feasibility of implementing PES schemes at the scale of entire watersheds. This is relevant to helping inform decision-making processes with respect to the economic scope of incentive-based watershed management in the context of the Guapia{\c{c}}u-Macacu watershed. Furthermore, the findings of this research can serve long-term watershed conservation initiatives and public policy in other watersheds of the Atlantic Forest biome by facilitating the targeting of conservation incentives for a cost-effective watershed management.}, language = {en} }