Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Report (22)
- Working Paper (13)
- Article (7)
- Preprint (5)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (48)
Keywords
- Optimierung (17)
- Optimization (12)
- Soft Computing (9)
- Modellierung (7)
- Evolutionärer Algorithmus (5)
- Globale Optimierung (5)
- Simulation (5)
- Benchmarking (4)
- Metaheuristik (4)
- Computational Intelligence (3)
- Genetisches Programmieren (3)
- Kriging (3)
- Maschinelles Lernen (3)
- Mehrkriterielle Optimierung (3)
- Modeling (3)
- Sequential Parameter Optimization (3)
- Sequentielle Parameter Optimierung (3)
- Surrogate (3)
- Surrogate Models (3)
- Versuchsplanung (3)
- 3D Printing (2)
- Bayesian Optimization (2)
- Co-Kriging (2)
- Combined simulation (2)
- Design of Experiments (2)
- Ensemble Methods (2)
- Event Detection (2)
- Evolutionary Computation (2)
- Evolutionsstrategie (2)
- Genetic Programming (2)
- Genetische Algorithmen (2)
- Imputation (2)
- Künstliche Intelligenz (2)
- Machine Learning (2)
- Metamodel (2)
- Multi-Criteria Optimization (2)
- Multiobjective Optimization (2)
- Optimierungsproblem (2)
- Parallelization (2)
- Prognose (2)
- R (2)
- Surrogat-Modellierung (2)
- Surrogate Modeling (2)
- Surrogate-based (2)
- Taxonomie (2)
- Taxonomy (2)
- 3D-Druck (1)
- Algorithm Tuning (1)
- Algorithmus (1)
- Angewandte Mathematik (1)
- Artificial intelligence (1)
- Automated Learning (1)
- BBOB (1)
- Bayesian Learning (1)
- Bayesian Regression (1)
- Big Data (1)
- Big data platform (1)
- Biogas (1)
- Biogas Plant (1)
- Ccomputational fluid dynamics (1)
- Cognition (1)
- Computational fluid dynamics (1)
- Conditional inference tree (1)
- Cyber-physische Produktionssysteme (1)
- Cyclone Dust Separator (1)
- Data Analysis (1)
- Data Mining (1)
- Data Modelling (1)
- Datenanalyse (1)
- Decision tree (1)
- Discrete Optimization (1)
- Electrostatic Precipitator (1)
- Ensemble based modeling (1)
- Entdeckendes Lernen (1)
- Entstauber (1)
- Erfahrungsbericht (1)
- Evolution Strategies (1)
- Evolutionary Algorithms (1)
- Evolutionary Robotics (1)
- Evolutionsstrategien (1)
- Evolutionäre Algorithmen (1)
- Expected Improvement (1)
- Expensive Optimization (1)
- Experiment (1)
- Experimental Algorithmics (1)
- Faserverbundwerkstoffe (1)
- Feature selection (1)
- Fehlende Daten (1)
- Finanzwirtschaft (1)
- Flowcurve (1)
- Flushing (1)
- Forschendes Lernen (1)
- Function Approximation (1)
- Funktionstest (1)
- Gaussian Process (1)
- Genetic Algorithms (1)
- Genetic programming (1)
- Health condition monitoring (1)
- Heuristics (1)
- Hot rolling (1)
- Industrie 4.0 (1)
- Industry 4.0 (1)
- Knowledge extraction (1)
- Kognition (1)
- Kognitive Referenzarchitektur (1)
- Lineare Regression (1)
- Machine learning (1)
- Massive Online Analysis (1)
- Meta-model (1)
- Metaheuristics (1)
- Metal (1)
- Metamodell (1)
- Metamodels (1)
- Missing Data (1)
- Mixed Models (1)
- Mixed-Effects Models (1)
- Model Selection (1)
- Modelierung (1)
- Multi-criteria Optimization (1)
- Multi-fidelity (1)
- Neural Networks (1)
- Neural and Evolutionary Computing (1)
- Numerische Strömungssimulation (1)
- On-line Algorithm (1)
- Parallelisierung (1)
- Parameter Tuning (1)
- Parametertuning (1)
- Performance (1)
- Predictive Analytics (1)
- Promotion (1)
- Regression (1)
- Robotics (1)
- SPOT (1)
- Sensor placement (1)
- Sensortechnik (1)
- Signalanalyse (1)
- Simulated annealing (1)
- Simulation-based Optimization (1)
- Simulationsmodell (1)
- Social Learning (1)
- Spülen (1)
- Stacked Generalization (1)
- Stacking (1)
- Statistics (1)
- Statistische Versuchsplanung (1)
- Structural Health Monitoring (1)
- Surrogate Mod (1)
- Surrogate Model (1)
- Surrogate Optimization (1)
- Surrogate model (1)
- Surrogate model based optimization (1)
- Surrogate-Model-Based Optimization (1)
- Surrogate-model-based Optimization (1)
- Surrogates (1)
- Surrogatmodellbasierte Optimierung (1)
- Test Function (1)
- Test function generator (1)
- Time Series (1)
- Time-series (1)
- Trinkwasser (1)
- Trinkwasserversorgung (1)
- Univariate Data (1)
- Unsicherheit (1)
- Variable reduction (1)
- Varianzanalyse (1)
- Verunreinigung (1)
- Vorgehensmodell (1)
- Vorverarbeitung (1)
- Wasserverteilung (1)
- Wasserwirtschaft (1)
- Water Distribution Systems (1)
- Water Quality Monitoring (1)
- Water distribution systems (1)
- Zeitreihe (1)
- Zeitreihenanalyse (1)
- Zylon Enstauber (1)
Modelling Zero-inflated Rainfall Data through the Use of Gaussian Process and Bayesian Regression
(2018)
Rainfall is a key parameter for understanding the water cycle. An accurate rainfall measurement is vital in the development of hydrological models. By means of indirect measurement, satellites can nowadays estimate the rainfall around the world. However, these measurements are not always accurate. As a first approach to generate a bias-corrected rainfall estimate using satellite data, the performance of Gaussian process and Bayesian regression is studied. The results show Gaussian process as the better option for this dataset but leave place to improvements on both modelling strategies.
An essential task for operation and planning of biogas plants is the optimization of substrate feed mixtures. Optimizing the monetary gain requires the determination of the exact amounts of maize, manure, grass silage, and other substrates. Accurate simulation models are mandatory for this optimization, because the underlying chemical processes are very slow. The simulation models themselves may be time-consuming to evaluate, hence we show how to use surrogate-model-based approaches to optimize biogas plants efficiently. In detail, a Kriging surrogate is employed. To improve model quality of this surrogate, we integrate cheaply available data into the optimization process. Doing so, Multi-fidelity modeling methods like Co-Kriging are employed. Furthermore, a two-layered modeling approach is employed to avoid deterioration of model quality due to discontinuities in the search space. At the same time, the cheaply available data is shown to be very useful for initialization of the employed optimization algorithms. Overall, we show how biogas plants can be efficiently modeled using data-driven methods, avoiding discontinuities as well as including cheaply available data. The application of the derived surrogate models to an optimization process is shown to be very difficult, yet successful for a lower problem dimension.
Cyclone separators are popular devices used to filter dust from the emitted flue gases. They are applied as pre-filters in many industrial processes including energy production and grain processing facilities.
Increasing computational power and the availability of 3D printers provide new tools for the combination of modeling and experimentation, which necessary for constructing efficient cyclones. Several simulation tools can be run in parallel, e.g., long running CFD simulations can be accompanied by experiments with 3D printers. Furthermore, results from analytical and data-driven models can be incorporated. There are fundamental differences between these modeling approaches: some models, e.g., analytical models, use domain knowledge, whereas data-driven models do not require any information about the underlying processes.
At the same time, data-driven models require input and output data, whereas analytical models do not. Combining results from models with different input-output structure is of great interest. This combination inspired the development of a new methodology. An optimization via multimodel simulation approach, which combines results from different models, is introduced.
Using cyclonic dust separators (cyclones) as a real-world simulation problem, the feasibility of this approach is demonstrated. Pros and cons of this approach are discussed and experiences from the experiments are presented.
Furthermore, technical problems, which are related to 3D-printing approaches, are discussed.
Increasing computational power and the availability of 3D printers provide new tools for the combination of modeling and experimentation. Several simulation tools can be run independently and in parallel, e.g., long running computational fluid dynamics simulations can be accompanied by experiments with 3D printers. Furthermore, results from analytical and data-driven models can be incorporated. However, there are fundamental differences between these modeling approaches: some models, e.g., analytical models, use domain knowledge, whereas data-driven models do not require any information about the underlying processes.
At the same time, data-driven models require input and output data, but analytical models do not. Combining results from models with different input-output structures might improve and accelerate the optimization process. The optimization via multimodel simulation (OMMS) approach, which is able to combine results from these different models, is introduced in this paper.
Using cyclonic dust separators as a real-world simulation problem, the feasibility of this approach is demonstrated and a proof-of-concept is presented. Cyclones are popular devices used to filter dust from the emitted flue gases. They are applied as pre-filters in many industrial processes including energy production and grain processing facilities. Pros and cons of this multimodel optimization approach are discussed and experiences from experiments are presented.
Evolutionary algorithm (EA) is an umbrella term used to describe population-based stochastic direct search algorithms that in some sense mimic natural evolution. Prominent representatives of such algorithms are genetic algorithms, evolution strategies, evolutionary programming, and genetic programming. On the basis of the evolutionary cycle, similarities and differences between these algorithms are described. We briefly discuss how EAs can be adapted to work well in case of multiple objectives, and dynamic or noisy optimization problems. We look at the tuning of algorithms and present some recent developments coming from theory. Finally, typical applications of EAs to real-world problems are shown, with special emphasis on data-mining applications
An important class of black-box optimization problems relies on using simulations to assess the quality of a given candidate solution. Solving such problems can be computationally expensive because each simulation is very time-consuming. We present an approach to mitigate this problem by distinguishing two factors of computational cost: the number of trials and the time needed to execute the trials. Our approach tries to keep down the number of trials by using Bayesian optimization (BO) –known to be sample efficient– and reducing wall-clock times by parallel execution of trials. We compare the performance of four parallelization methods and two model-free alternatives. Each method is evaluated on all 24 objective functions of the Black-Box-Optimization- Benchmarking (BBOB) test suite in their five, ten, and 20-dimensional versions. Additionally, their performance is investigated on six test cases in robot learning. The results show that parallelized BO outperforms the state-of-the-art CMA-ES on the BBOB test functions, especially for higher dimensions. On the robot learning tasks, the differences are less clear, but the data do support parallelized BO as the ‘best guess’, winning on some cases and never losing.
Many black-box optimization problems rely on simulations to evaluate the quality of candidate solutions. These evaluations can be computationally expensive and very time-consuming. We present and approach to mitigate this problem by taking into consideration two factors: The number of evaluations and the execution time. We aim to keep the number of evaluations low by using Bayesian optimization (BO) – known to be sample efficient– and to reduce wall-clock times by executing parallel evaluations. Four parallelization methods using BO as optimizer are compared against the inherently parallel CMA-ES. Each method is evaluated on all the 24 objective functions of the Black-Box-Optimization-Benchmarking test suite in their 20-dimensional versions. The results show that parallelized BO outperforms the state-of-the-art CMA-ES on most of the test functions, also on higher dimensions.
Sensor placement for contaminant detection in water distribution systems (WDS) has become a topic of great interest aiming to secure a population's water supply. Several approaches can be found in the literature with differences ranging from the objective selected to optimize to the methods implemented to solve the optimization problem. In this work we aim to give an overview of the current work in sensor placement with focus on contaminant detection for WDS. We present some of the objectives for which the sensor placement problem is defined along with common optimization algorithms and Toolkits available to help with algorithm testing and comparison.
Sequential Parameter Optimization is a model-based optimization methodology, which includes several techniques for handling uncertainty. Simple approaches such as sharp- ening and more sophisticated approaches such as optimal computing budget allocation are available. For many real world engineering problems, the objective function can be evaluated at different levels of fidelity. For instance, a CFD simulation might provide a very time consuming but accurate way to estimate the quality of a solution.The same solution could be evaluated based on simplified mathematical equations, leading to a cheaper but less accurate estimate. Combining these different levels of fidelity in a model-based optimization process is referred to as multi-fidelity optimization. This chapter describes uncertainty-handling techniques for meta-model based search heuristics in combination with multi-fidelity optimization. Co-Kriging is one power- ful method to correlate multiple sets of data from different levels of fidelity. For the first time, Sequential Parameter Optimization with co-Kriging is applied to noisy test functions. This study will introduce these techniques and discuss how they can be applied to real-world examples.
Cyclone Dust Separators are devices often used to filter solid particles from flue gas. Such cyclones are supposed to filter as much solid particles from the carrying gas as possible. At the same time, they should only introduce a minimal pressure loss to the system. Hence, collection efficiency has to be maximized and pressure loss minimized. Both the collection efficiency and pressure loss are heavily influenced by the cyclones geometry. In this paper, we optimize seven geometrical parameters of an analytical cyclone model. Furthermore, noise variables are introduced to the model, representing the non-deterministic structure of the real-world problem. This is used to investigate robustness and sensitivity of solutions. Both the deterministic as well as the stochastic model are optimized with an SMS-EMOA. The SMS-EMOA is compared to a single objective optimization algorithm. For the harder, stochastic optimization problem, a surrogate-model-supported SMS-EMOA is compared against the model-free SMS-EMOA. The model supported approach yields better solutions with the same run-time budget.