Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Report (22)
- Working Paper (13)
- Article (7)
- Preprint (5)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (48)
Keywords
- Optimierung (17)
- Optimization (12)
- Soft Computing (9)
- Modellierung (7)
- Evolutionärer Algorithmus (5)
- Globale Optimierung (5)
- Simulation (5)
- Benchmarking (4)
- Metaheuristik (4)
- Computational Intelligence (3)
- Genetisches Programmieren (3)
- Kriging (3)
- Maschinelles Lernen (3)
- Mehrkriterielle Optimierung (3)
- Modeling (3)
- Sequential Parameter Optimization (3)
- Sequentielle Parameter Optimierung (3)
- Surrogate (3)
- Surrogate Models (3)
- Versuchsplanung (3)
- 3D Printing (2)
- Bayesian Optimization (2)
- Co-Kriging (2)
- Combined simulation (2)
- Design of Experiments (2)
- Ensemble Methods (2)
- Event Detection (2)
- Evolutionary Computation (2)
- Evolutionsstrategie (2)
- Genetic Programming (2)
- Genetische Algorithmen (2)
- Imputation (2)
- Künstliche Intelligenz (2)
- Machine Learning (2)
- Metamodel (2)
- Multi-Criteria Optimization (2)
- Multiobjective Optimization (2)
- Optimierungsproblem (2)
- Parallelization (2)
- Prognose (2)
- R (2)
- Surrogat-Modellierung (2)
- Surrogate Modeling (2)
- Surrogate-based (2)
- Taxonomie (2)
- Taxonomy (2)
- 3D-Druck (1)
- Algorithm Tuning (1)
- Algorithmus (1)
- Angewandte Mathematik (1)
- Artificial intelligence (1)
- Automated Learning (1)
- BBOB (1)
- Bayesian Learning (1)
- Bayesian Regression (1)
- Big Data (1)
- Big data platform (1)
- Biogas (1)
- Biogas Plant (1)
- Ccomputational fluid dynamics (1)
- Cognition (1)
- Computational fluid dynamics (1)
- Conditional inference tree (1)
- Cyber-physische Produktionssysteme (1)
- Cyclone Dust Separator (1)
- Data Analysis (1)
- Data Mining (1)
- Data Modelling (1)
- Datenanalyse (1)
- Decision tree (1)
- Discrete Optimization (1)
- Electrostatic Precipitator (1)
- Ensemble based modeling (1)
- Entdeckendes Lernen (1)
- Entstauber (1)
- Erfahrungsbericht (1)
- Evolution Strategies (1)
- Evolutionary Algorithms (1)
- Evolutionary Robotics (1)
- Evolutionsstrategien (1)
- Evolutionäre Algorithmen (1)
- Expected Improvement (1)
- Expensive Optimization (1)
- Experiment (1)
- Experimental Algorithmics (1)
- Faserverbundwerkstoffe (1)
- Feature selection (1)
- Fehlende Daten (1)
- Finanzwirtschaft (1)
- Flowcurve (1)
- Flushing (1)
- Forschendes Lernen (1)
- Function Approximation (1)
- Funktionstest (1)
- Gaussian Process (1)
- Genetic Algorithms (1)
- Genetic programming (1)
- Health condition monitoring (1)
- Heuristics (1)
- Hot rolling (1)
- Industrie 4.0 (1)
- Industry 4.0 (1)
- Knowledge extraction (1)
- Kognition (1)
- Kognitive Referenzarchitektur (1)
- Lineare Regression (1)
- Machine learning (1)
- Massive Online Analysis (1)
- Meta-model (1)
- Metaheuristics (1)
- Metal (1)
- Metamodell (1)
- Metamodels (1)
- Missing Data (1)
- Mixed Models (1)
- Mixed-Effects Models (1)
- Model Selection (1)
- Modelierung (1)
- Multi-criteria Optimization (1)
- Multi-fidelity (1)
- Neural Networks (1)
- Neural and Evolutionary Computing (1)
- Numerische Strömungssimulation (1)
- On-line Algorithm (1)
- Parallelisierung (1)
- Parameter Tuning (1)
- Parametertuning (1)
- Performance (1)
- Predictive Analytics (1)
- Promotion (1)
- Regression (1)
- Robotics (1)
- SPOT (1)
- Sensor placement (1)
- Sensortechnik (1)
- Signalanalyse (1)
- Simulated annealing (1)
- Simulation-based Optimization (1)
- Simulationsmodell (1)
- Social Learning (1)
- Spülen (1)
- Stacked Generalization (1)
- Stacking (1)
- Statistics (1)
- Statistische Versuchsplanung (1)
- Structural Health Monitoring (1)
- Surrogate Mod (1)
- Surrogate Model (1)
- Surrogate Optimization (1)
- Surrogate model (1)
- Surrogate model based optimization (1)
- Surrogate-Model-Based Optimization (1)
- Surrogate-model-based Optimization (1)
- Surrogates (1)
- Surrogatmodellbasierte Optimierung (1)
- Test Function (1)
- Test function generator (1)
- Time Series (1)
- Time-series (1)
- Trinkwasser (1)
- Trinkwasserversorgung (1)
- Univariate Data (1)
- Unsicherheit (1)
- Variable reduction (1)
- Varianzanalyse (1)
- Verunreinigung (1)
- Vorgehensmodell (1)
- Vorverarbeitung (1)
- Wasserverteilung (1)
- Wasserwirtschaft (1)
- Water Distribution Systems (1)
- Water Quality Monitoring (1)
- Water distribution systems (1)
- Zeitreihe (1)
- Zeitreihenanalyse (1)
- Zylon Enstauber (1)
Die steigende Komplexität der Produktionssysteme, insbesondere im Maschinenbau, führt zu einer Belastung für Automatisierer und Anlagenbauer. Um dieser Belastung entgegenzuwirken, bietet Industrie 4.0 mit Cyber-physischen Systemen und intelligenten Automatisierungssystemen eine Lösung. Dabei wird menschliches Expertenwissen in die Automatisierung verlagert, indem Ziele deklarativ formuliert werden, anstatt prozedurale Handlungsabläufe zu beschreiben. Dieser Ansatz ermöglicht es intelligenten Systemen, ausreichenden Handlungsspielraum zu haben und den menschlichen Aufwand bei der Optimierung, Inbetriebnahme und Anlagenumbau zu reduzieren. Um intelligente Automation umzusetzen, werden neue Automatisierungstechniken und Software-Services benötigt, die verschiedene Methoden wie maschinelles Lernen, Condition-Monitoring und Diagnose-Algorithmen sowie Optimierungsverfahren nutzen. Derzeit werden diese Services unabhängig voneinander implementiert und die Schnittstellen sind oft proprietär, was den Austausch von Daten, Modellen und Ergebnissen erschwert. Dennoch strebt Industrie 4.0 die Zusammenarbeit von Geräten und Komponenten unterschiedlicher Hersteller an. Als ein Lösungsansatz wurde in diesem Projekt eine kognitive Referenzarchitektur entwickelt, welche die genannten Punkte adressiert.
Die Arbeit beschreibt die Entwicklung und Verbreitung künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) und die damit verbundenen Herausforderungen und Chancen. Es wird hervorgehoben, dass trotz des offensichtlichen Nutzens von KI, Bedenken hinsichtlich unerwünschter Nebenwirkungen durch fehlerhafte oder missbräuchliche Anwendungen bestehen. Um diese Herausforderungen zu bewältigen, wird ein Ansatz vorgeschlagen, der als “konviviale künstliche Intelligenz” bezeichnet wird. Dieser Ansatz zielt auf ein harmonisches Zusammenspiel zwischen KI und Mensch ab und betont die Notwendigkeit einer menschenzentrierten Gestaltung bei der Entwicklung und Implementierung von KI-Modellen.
Drinking water supply and distribution systems are critical infrastructure that has to be well maintained for the safety of the public. One important tool in the maintenance of water distribution systems (WDS) is flushing. Flushing is a process carried out in a periodic fashion to clean sediments and other contaminants in the water pipes. Given the different topographies, water composition and supply demand between WDS no single flushing strategy is suitable for all of them. In this report a non-exhaustive overview of optimization methods for flushing in WDS is given. Implementation of optimization methods for the flushing procedure and the flushing planing are presented. Suggestions are given as a possible option to optimise existing flushing planing frameworks.
This paper introduces CAAI, a novel cognitive architecture for artificial intelligence in cyber-physical production systems. The goal of the architecture is to reduce the implementation effort for the usage of artificial intelligence algorithms. The core of the CAAI is a cognitive module that processes declarative goals of the user, selects suitable models and algorithms, and creates a configuration for the execution of a processing pipeline on a big data platform. Constant observation and evaluation against performance criteria assess the performance of pipelines for many and varying use cases. Based on these evaluations, the pipelines are automatically adapted if necessary. The modular design with well-defined interfaces enables the reusability and extensibility of pipeline components. A big data platform implements this modular design supported by technologies such as Docker, Kubernetes, and Kafka for virtualization and orchestration of the individual components and their communication. The implementation of the architecture is evaluated using a real-world use case.
This survey compiles ideas and recommendations from more than a dozen researchers with different backgrounds and from different institutes around the world. Promoting best practice in benchmarking is its main goal. The article discusses eight essential topics in benchmarking: clearly stated goals, well- specified problems, suitable algorithms, adequate performance measures, thoughtful analysis, effective and efficient designs, comprehensible presentations, and guaranteed reproducibility. The final goal is to provide well-accepted guidelines (rules) that might be useful for authors and reviewers. As benchmarking in optimization is an active and evolving field of research this manuscript is meant to co-evolve over time by means of periodic updates.
We propose a hybridization approach called Regularized-Surrogate- Optimization (RSO) aimed at overcoming difficulties related to high- dimensionality. It combines standard Kriging-based SMBO with regularization techniques. The employed regularization methods use the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). An extensive study is performed on a set of artificial test functions and two real-world applications: the electrostatic precipitator problem and a multilayered composite design problem. Experiments reveal that RSO requires significantly less time than Kriging to obtain comparable results. The pros and cons of the RSO approach are discussed and recommendations for practitioners are presented.
Surrogate-based optimization relies on so-called infill criteria (acquisition functions) to decide which point to evaluate next. When Kriging is used as the surrogate model of choice (also called Bayesian optimization), one of the most frequently chosen criteria is expected improvement. We argue that the popularity of expected improvement largely relies on its theoretical properties rather than empirically validated performance. Few results from the literature show evidence, that under certain conditions, expected improvement may perform worse than something as simple as the predicted value of the surrogate model. We benchmark both infill criteria in an extensive empirical study on the ‘BBOB’ function set. This investigation includes a detailed study of the impact of problem dimensionality on algorithm performance. The results support the hypothesis that exploration loses importance with increasing problem dimensionality. A statistical analysis reveals that the purely exploitative search with the predicted value criterion performs better on most problems of five or higher dimensions. Possible reasons for these results are discussed. In addition, we give an in-depth guide for choosing the infill criteria based on prior knowledge about the problem at hand, its dimensionality, and the available budget.
Real-world problems such as computational fluid dynamics simulations and finite element analyses are computationally expensive. A standard approach to mitigating the high computational expense is Surrogate-Based Optimization (SBO). Yet, due to the high-dimensionality of many simulation problems, SBO is not directly applicable or not efficient. Reducing the dimensionality of the search space is one method to overcome this limitation. In addition to the applicability of SBO, dimensionality reduction enables easier data handling and improved data and model interpretability. Regularization is considered as one state-of-the-art technique for dimensionality reduction. We propose a hybridization approach called Regularized-Surrogate-Optimization (RSO) aimed at overcoming difficulties related to high-dimensionality. It couples standard Kriging-based SBO with regularization techniques. The employed regularization methods are based on three adaptations of the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). In addition, tree-based methods are analyzed as an alternative variable selection method. An extensive study is performed on a set of artificial test functions and two real-world applications: the electrostatic precipitator problem and a multilayered composite design problem. Experiments reveal that RSO requires significantly less time than standard SBO to obtain comparable results. The pros and cons of the RSO approach are discussed, and recommendations for practitioners are presented.
Many black-box optimization problems rely on simulations to evaluate the quality of candidate solutions. These evaluations can be computationally expensive and very time-consuming. We present and approach to mitigate this problem by taking into consideration two factors: The number of evaluations and the execution time. We aim to keep the number of evaluations low by using Bayesian optimization (BO) – known to be sample efficient– and to reduce wall-clock times by executing parallel evaluations. Four parallelization methods using BO as optimizer are compared against the inherently parallel CMA-ES. Each method is evaluated on all the 24 objective functions of the Black-Box-Optimization-Benchmarking test suite in their 20-dimensional versions. The results show that parallelized BO outperforms the state-of-the-art CMA-ES on most of the test functions, also on higher dimensions.
An important class of black-box optimization problems relies on using simulations to assess the quality of a given candidate solution. Solving such problems can be computationally expensive because each simulation is very time-consuming. We present an approach to mitigate this problem by distinguishing two factors of computational cost: the number of trials and the time needed to execute the trials. Our approach tries to keep down the number of trials by using Bayesian optimization (BO) –known to be sample efficient– and reducing wall-clock times by parallel execution of trials. We compare the performance of four parallelization methods and two model-free alternatives. Each method is evaluated on all 24 objective functions of the Black-Box-Optimization- Benchmarking (BBOB) test suite in their five, ten, and 20-dimensional versions. Additionally, their performance is investigated on six test cases in robot learning. The results show that parallelized BO outperforms the state-of-the-art CMA-ES on the BBOB test functions, especially for higher dimensions. On the robot learning tasks, the differences are less clear, but the data do support parallelized BO as the ‘best guess’, winning on some cases and never losing.